Date: 09 Jul 2001 01:51:10 +0200 From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> To: arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Type differences Message-ID: <xzphewnou8h.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> In-Reply-To: <xzpbsmvqe73.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> References: <xzpbsmvqe73.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> writes: > What's the idea here? off_t is the exact same size and signedness on > both platforms, so why not use the same definition for both? And why > make size_t an int on i386 but a long on alpha, when on both these > platforms int and long are identical? Umm, diregard the size_t bit - I thought the Alpha was ILP64, but it's I32LP64. It would still be possible to change size_t to unsigned long on the i386, though. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzphewnou8h.fsf>