Date: Wed, 16 Aug 1995 23:54:55 -0700 (PDT) From: "Rodney W. Grimes" <rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com> To: pst@shockwave.com (Paul Traina) Cc: jkh@time.cdrom.com, peter@freefall.FreeBSD.org, CVS-commiters@freefall.FreeBSD.org, cvs-usrsbin@freefall.FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.sbin/sendmail/src daemon.c deliver.c readcf.c Message-ID: <199508170654.XAA22386@gndrsh.aac.dev.com> In-Reply-To: <199508170624.XAA04528@precipice.shockwave.com> from "Paul Traina" at Aug 16, 95 11:24:51 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > How about rdist 6.x as a port? Given that -it- is the one going through > development, it offers new features, and it is supported elsewhere, that > seems like the best compromise. The new rdist doesn't have to ship as > part of FreeBSD (at this time), and it would be a good canidate for moving > to the external heirarchy once it (and we) mature. Yes, please go do that!! Peter, does that work for you as well? > paul > > From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com> > Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.sbin/sendmail/src daemon.c deliver.c readcf. > >>c > > Be REALLY careful what you do here. If you all of a sudden make us > > incompatible with every non-FreeBSD machine out there, I will visit you > > with a chain-saw. > > Aww Paul, you're such a party pooper! > > > It is possible to have "both" rdists, but you need to think about how you'r > >>e > > going to do that. > > Maybe one as a port? That would actually be easier! > > Jordan > -- Rod Grimes rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com Accurate Automation Company Reliable computers for FreeBSD
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199508170654.XAA22386>