Date: Thu, 26 Nov 1998 23:31:49 +0000 From: Nicolas Souchu <nsouch@teaser.fr> To: Peter Jeremy <peter.jeremy@auss2.alcatel.com.au> Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: LPIP losing clock interrupts - need new spl...() call Message-ID: <19981126233149.59686@breizh.prism.uvsq.fr> In-Reply-To: <98Nov24.084033est.40335@border.alcanet.com.au>; from Peter Jeremy on Tue, Nov 24, 1998 at 08:40:58AM %2B1100 References: <98Nov24.084033est.40335@border.alcanet.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Thanks for the PRs references. On Tue, Nov 24, 1998 at 08:40:58AM +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote: >I haven't done any further work. I have done a bit of thinking about >how to go about handling contention, but didn't come to any firm >conclusions. I only have one ECP machine, so I can't use an ECP >protocol in any case. My only comment is that it would be useful if >the protocol could also be used on a normal bi-directional parallel >port. Yes, but certainly slow. Nicolas. -- nsouch@teaser.fr / nsouch@freebsd.org FreeBSD - Turning PCs into workstations - http://www.FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19981126233149.59686>