Date: Sun, 3 Nov 2013 15:18:44 +0100 From: Thierry Thomas <thierry@FreeBSD.org> To: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com> Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r332557 - head/lang/gcc Message-ID: <20131103141844.GA94359@graf.pompo.net> In-Reply-To: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1311031456490.3029@tuna.site> References: <201311022320.rA2NKEcg089316@svn.freebsd.org> <20131103110034.GA80884@graf.pompo.net> <alpine.LNX.2.00.1311031456490.3029@tuna.site>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Le dim 3 nov 13 à 14:59:20 +0100, Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com> écrivait : > > Do we still need lang/gcc and lang/gcc46? > > Yes, since lang/gcc is the canonical version that should be used > (and is pulled in by USE_GCC=yes, for example). At that point > lang/gcc46 will be the final release of GCC 4.6, lang/gcc47 > will track GCC 4.7 and lang/gcc will track GCC 4.7 releases. OK, thanks. Just asking because on one among my machines, both of them are installed, despite the CONFLICTS lines - I don't know how I managed to get that... -- Th. Thomas.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20131103141844.GA94359>