Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 12:57:01 -0500 From: Ryan Tomayko <rtomayko@gmail.com> To: Vsevolod Stakhov <vsevolod@highsecure.ru> Cc: ports@freebsd.org, "Sergey A. Osokin" <osa@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: nginx upstream_fair module patch Message-ID: <47C5A46D.4030800@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <47C54841.3060601@highsecure.ru> References: <47C46645.80700@gmail.com> <47C54841.3060601@highsecure.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Vsevolod Stakhov wrote: > I don't think that it is a good idea to have 3-rd party code as FreeBSD > ports patches (ports patches are FreeBSD specific code). I think it > would be better to have some directive for enabling extra modules for > nginx and make subports for such modules, in the similar way as php > ports for example. That makes sense. Sergey responded off list with the exact same advice. I'll take it. > Here is a small patch. Maybe this should be better done using OPTIONS. It looks like both php and mail/postfix would be good examples of how something like this might be best accomplished. Thanks for the example; I think I basically understand what's going on here. Thanks -- Ryan Tomayko <rtomayko@gmail.com> http://tomayko.com http://lesscode.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?47C5A46D.4030800>