Date: Sun, 6 Jun 2004 23:43:41 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug Barton <DougB@FreeBSD.org> To: Oliver Eikemeier <eikemeier@fillmore-labs.com> Cc: Melvyn Sopacua <ports@webteckies.org> Subject: Re: PORT_REPLACES_BASE_BIND and some gnome ports Message-ID: <20040606234038.F1850@ync.qbhto.arg> In-Reply-To: <408117AD.4000101@fillmore-labs.com> References: <200404171307.49957.ports@webteckies.org> <408117AD.4000101@fillmore-labs.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 17 Apr 2004, Oliver Eikemeier wrote:
> Try PORT_REPLACES_BASE_BIND8_INCLUDES. We can't check this from the Makefile
> though, but better be safe than sorry - it caused problems in the past.
The problem with the includes was always BIND 8 only, it never affected
BIND 9. Also, the fix went in 2.5 months ago. I would suggest that after
the next BIND 8 (and 8.4.x) upgrade (which should be soon) that you
change your test to look explicitly for
PORT_REPLACES_BASE_BIND8_INCLUDES and not raise FUD where it isn't
warranted.
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040606234038.F1850>