Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 02:30:59 +0300 From: Dan Naumov <dan.naumov@gmail.com> To: Freddie Cash <fjwcash@gmail.com> Cc: FreeBSD-STABLE Mailing List <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: ZFS and df weirdness Message-ID: <cf9b1ee00907041630u12e68e58l1bb317b42a6ea5fc@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <b269bc570907041626j53d4b3f6y5f710d2f55631ef4@mail.gmail.com> References: <cf9b1ee00907041455v57b1e1eatf7b4cf0a060b938c@mail.gmail.com> <b269bc570907041626j53d4b3f6y5f710d2f55631ef4@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Jul 5, 2009 at 2:26 AM, Freddie Cash<fjwcash@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Sat, Jul 4, 2009 at 2:55 PM, Dan Naumov <dan.naumov@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hello list. >> >> I have a single 2tb disk used on a 7.2-release/amd64 system with a >> small part of it given to UFS and most of the disk given to a single >> "simple" zfs pool with several filesystems without redundancy. I've >> noticed a really weird thing regarding what "df" reports regarding the >> "total space" of one of my filesystems: >> >> atom# df -h >> Filesystem =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 Size =A0 =A0Used =A0 Avail Capacity =A0Mounte= d on >> /dev/ad12s1a =A0 =A0 =A0 =A015G =A0 =A01.0G =A0 =A0 13G =A0 =A0 7% =A0 = =A0/ >> devfs =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A01.0K =A0 =A01.0K =A0 =A0 =A00B =A0 100%= =A0 =A0/dev >> linprocfs =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A04.0K =A0 =A04.0K =A0 =A0 =A00B =A0 100% =A0= =A0/usr/compat/linux/proc >> tank/DATA =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A01.8T =A0 =A0292G =A0 =A01.5T =A0 =A016% =A0= =A0/DATA >> tank/home =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A01.5T =A0 =A0 =A00B =A0 =A01.5T =A0 =A0 0% = =A0 =A0/home >> tank/home/jago =A0 =A0 1.5T =A0 =A0128K =A0 =A01.5T =A0 =A0 0% =A0 =A0/h= ome/jago >> tank/home/karni =A0 =A01.5T =A0 =A0 =A00B =A0 =A01.5T =A0 =A0 0% =A0 =A0= /home/karni >> tank/usr/local =A0 =A0 1.5T =A0 =A0455M =A0 =A01.5T =A0 =A0 0% =A0 =A0/u= sr/local >> tank/usr/obj =A0 =A0 =A0 1.5T =A0 =A0 =A00B =A0 =A01.5T =A0 =A0 0% =A0 = =A0/usr/obj >> tank/usr/ports =A0 =A0 1.5T =A0 =A0412M =A0 =A01.5T =A0 =A0 0% =A0 =A0/u= sr/ports >> tank/usr/src =A0 =A0 =A0 1.5T =A0 =A0495M =A0 =A01.5T =A0 =A0 0% =A0 =A0= /usr/src >> tank/var/log =A0 =A0 =A0 1.5T =A0 =A0256K =A0 =A01.5T =A0 =A0 0% =A0 =A0= /var/log >> >> Considering that every single filesystem is part of the exact same >> pool, with no custom options whatsoever used during filesystem >> creation (except for mountpoints), why is the size of tank/DATA 1.8T >> while the others are 1.5T? > > Did you set a reservation for any of the other filesystems?=A0 Reserved s= pace > is not listed in the "general" pool. no custom options whatsoever were used during filesystem creation (except for mountpoints). - Dan
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?cf9b1ee00907041630u12e68e58l1bb317b42a6ea5fc>