Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2011 10:34:52 -0300 From: Sergio de Almeida Lenzi <lenzi.sergio@gmail.com> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: testing PKGNG Message-ID: <1316007292.44594.9.camel@z6000.lenzicasa> In-Reply-To: <20110914084345.GB22145@azathoth.lan> References: <20110913211619.GA46319@lpthe.jussieu.fr> <20110914084345.GB22145@azathoth.lan>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Em Qua, 2011-09-14 às 10:43 +0200, Baptiste Daroussin escreveu: > > no pkgng do ont share something penguinist at all :) > > pkgng is just the result of long studies and reflexion about packaging > (studying > what is done elsewhere: apt/dpkg, yum/rpm, pacman, aix, solaris, > netbsd, openbsd > and how to have something that try to take the good ideas from there, > try not to > take the *over engineered* complicated part. And most important try to > do it the > FreeBSD way: which means it should work with the ports tree as-is (and > help > improve it in the future), so we are safe no real penguinism in > pkgng :) I think pkgng will on on his way to the freebsd release (perhaps the 9.x will include it in the base system) but I need a solution now. Even if portmaster, is an excelent software, it could not help me (40 servers, and counting...) each server with about 880 packages that must be in sync The solution pkgng gives me, is what I was looking for, even the software is "alpha"... and sure have some problems, the version I tested (the one is in the servers) is working for me. I even tried to port "pacman, from arch linux", but pkgng is even faster.. Sergio
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1316007292.44594.9.camel>