Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2003 21:52:14 +0200 From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> To: Bosko Milekic <bmilekic@technokratis.com> Cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/kern subr_param.c sys_pipe.c src/sys/sys pipe.h Message-ID: <3770.1057866734@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 10 Jul 2003 15:37:34 -0000." <20030710153734.GA1101@technokratis.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <20030710153734.GA1101@technokratis.com>, Bosko Milekic writes: > With the recent bug reporting regarding kmem_map being too small > coming in, I'd have to say that I agree with that assertion. Address > space has become more expensive than memory, at least on ia32, and > it's gotten to the point where we need to re-evaluate some of our > autosizing and max size constants (for example, see VM_KMEM_SIZE_MAX). I have set my cross-hair on struct buf (including sbufs) and struct bio in this respect, they will not require permanent KVA when I'm done with them, but the time-line is 6-current not 5-stable. We may be able do some low-hanging fruit for 5-stable if we are sufficiently motivated. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3770.1057866734>