Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 22 Mar 2004 10:31:53 -0500
From:      Adam Weinberger <adamw@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Anthony Ginepro <anthony.ginepro@laposte.net>
Cc:        freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: ports/62486: [NEW PORT] x11-wm/ion-2: Ion is a tiling tabbed window manager designed with keyboard users in mind.
Message-ID:  <20040322153153.GF39341@toxic.magnesium.net>
In-Reply-To: <20040322081408.GA2172@renaissance.homeip.net>
References:  <200403211030.i2LAUM3G077796@freefall.freebsd.org> <20040321153155.GX39341@toxic.magnesium.net> <20040322001832.GA28099@moo.holy.cow> <20040322081408.GA2172@renaissance.homeip.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>> (03.22.2004 @ 0314 PST): Anthony Ginepro said, in 0.7K: <<
> It has taken 2 years until ion2 became stable. Hence I don't think ion4 will
> appear soon.
> 
> My wish would be to have ion-2-20040207.tar.gz as x11-wm/ion,
> and ion-3ds-20040316-1.tar.gz, ion-3ds-200ymmdd.tar.gz as x11-wm/ion-devel.
> 
> When ion-3 become stable, it will be x11-wm/ion, ion-4 as ion-devel and so on.
>> end of "Re: ports/62486: [NEW PORT] x11-wm/ion-2: Ion is a tiling tabbed window manager designed with keyboard users in mind." from Anthony Ginepro <<

I'm inclined to agree with this. If ion-2 is considered the stable ion,
there's no reason to keep ion-1 around.

And besides, given the people who will prefer ion as their wm, if they
are insistent upon ion-1, they'll probably know how to pull it from
cvs/cvsup ;;)

# Adam


--
Adam Weinberger
adamw@gnome.org  \\oo//  adamw@FreeBSD.org
adamw@vectors.cx  \\// adamw@magnesium.net
http://www.vectors.cx



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040322153153.GF39341>