Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 14 Jan 2020 16:42:49 +0200
From:      Stefan Parvu <sparvu@kronometrix.org>
To:        =?utf-8?Q?Roger_Pau_Monn=C3=A9?= <roger.pau@citrix.com>
Cc:        freebsd-xen@freebsd.org, "<novel@freebsd.org>" <novel@FreeBSD.org>
Subject:   Re: FreeBSD 12.1 hypervisor management tools
Message-ID:  <F3A1A210-D330-4A76-853A-292F540D6A07@kronometrix.org>
In-Reply-To: <20200114110125.GM11738@Air-de-Roger>
References:  <BD698539-EBB2-4B24-B08E-85B91AA83FB1@kronometrix.org> <CAFt_eMpdxG1TrPp4y-m4fm7egBzH2jDD8MkX8uqco4FE8=C=ag@mail.gmail.com> <D792562A-6A5B-4BD6-978C-DFAF16480D05@kronometrix.org> <69EDA7BA-EC3C-4C21-9AF6-12723CFAFBFF@kronometrix.org> <20200113140839.GJ11738@Air-de-Roger> <AE00390E-3186-4B09-A810-A31FE06AE67E@kronometrix.org> <20200114110125.GM11738@Air-de-Roger>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> The first step should be to report those errors, and figure out
> whether someone has interest in getting libvirt working on FreeBSD/Xen
> and maintaining it in a sane state. If there's no interest we should
> drop the Xen option from the libvirt port to not give users false
> expectations.

Right. Makes sense. I will handle that in next days and make a short =
report about it.
If libvirt is not an option I would still like to see how Xen compares =
with bhyve and kvm
for some of our applications and usage.=20

Stefan=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?F3A1A210-D330-4A76-853A-292F540D6A07>