Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2001 09:26:08 +0200 From: "Ari Suutari" <ari@suutari.iki.fi> To: "Ari Suutari" <ari@suutari.iki.fi>, "Nate Williams" <nate@yogotech.com>, "Jeroen C. van Gelderen" <jeroen@vangelderen.org> Cc: "Nate Williams" <nate@yogotech.com>, "FreeBSD Java" <freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: Are syscall wrappers needed in JNI? Message-ID: <05ce01c0a2ea$0cb6afc0$0e05a8c0@coffee> References: <3A9AE85F.C6F06D96@vangelderen.org><15002.60084.89087.467979@nomad.yogotech.com><3A9EF71F.A13189C6@vangelderen.org> <15006.63617.145790.5705@nomad.yogotech.com> <05bd01c0a2e9$a1b669e0$0e05a8c0@coffee>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi,
Replying to myself....
> What this
> means that it *IS* safe to call methods that are wrapped by
> JVM.
methods -> functions (too much oo stuff in brains). I also forgot
to say that to my understanding one can call functions with their
real names (not the ones beginning with JVM_) because of the
behaviour of loader I explained in previous e-mail.
Ari S.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?05ce01c0a2ea$0cb6afc0$0e05a8c0>