Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 22 Nov 2014 14:05:52 -0700
From:      Ian Lepore <ian@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Dan Raymond <draymond@foxvalley.net>
Cc:        "freebsd-arm@freebsd.org" <freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>, ticso@cicely.de
Subject:   Re: new support for Raspberry Pi B+
Message-ID:  <1416690352.1147.333.camel@revolution.hippie.lan>
In-Reply-To: <5470F87D.1040208@foxvalley.net>
References:  <5470E81A.3070009@foxvalley.net> <20141122200952.GA22446@cicely7.cicely.de> <5470F87D.1040208@foxvalley.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 2014-11-22 at 13:56 -0700, Dan Raymond wrote:
> On 11/22/2014 1:09 PM, Bernd Walter wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 12:46:34PM -0700, Dan Raymond wrote:
> >> Further testing with the 16GB Kingston reveals that it is unstable even
> >> at low speed.  I hit the following panic while executing "portsnap fetch
> >> update" on a r274416 build:
> >>
> >> dev = mmcsd0s2a, ino = 155101, fs = /mnt/ufs
> >> panic: ffs_freefile: freeing free inode
> >> KDB: enter: panic
> >> [ thread pid 8 tid 100056 ]
> >> Stopped at      $d:     ldrb    r15, [r15, r15, ror r15]!
> >> db>
> > Maybe you've received a counterfeit.
> > Unfortunately there are a lot of them on the market.
> > Some of them are technically smaller than they claim and overwrite
> > other data if they run short.
> 
> I considered that originally which is why I bought 4 different cards of 
> different brands for testing (Transcend, SanDisk, Samsung, Kingston):
> 
> http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00CBD0XSI/ref=oh_aui_detailpage_o06_s00?ie=UTF8&psc=1
> http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00M55C0NS/ref=oh_aui_detailpage_o04_s00?ie=UTF8&psc=1
> http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00IVPU7DQ/ref=oh_aui_detailpage_o03_s00?ie=UTF8&psc=1
> http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B003WIRFD2/ref=oh_aui_detailpage_o01_s00?ie=UTF8&psc=1
> 
> None of them will boot FreeBSD at high speed and I have seen SD related 
> panics with 3 of them (so far) at low speed.

I would actually dispute that this one is an sd-related panic, unless
you have messages about gvfs_iodone failures on the console before the
panic.  Otherwise this is more likely another memory corruption problem
similar to the panics being reported on wandboard.

-- Ian





Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1416690352.1147.333.camel>