Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 11 Jun 2014 15:24:29 +0000
From:      bz-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 188995] [NEW PORT] revive port devel/codeville - a distributed version control system, uses python
Message-ID:  <bug-188995-13-lPZSroxEaQ@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-188995-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-188995-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188995

--- Comment #6 from C Hutchinson <portmaster@bsdforge.com> ---
(In reply to John Marino from comment #4)
> er, um.
> 
> acknowledging this is a 10-second scan:
> 
> 1) "COMMENT= An anarchic control version system without unnecessary
> re-merges"
> portlint doesn't complain about that?  Did you run portlint?
> 
> 2) i don't understand hardcoding WITHOUT_PSYCO=yes
> Why not:
>   A) remove this line
>   B) remove pre-everything target (warning makes no sense if psyco is not an
> option)
>   C) remove the .ifndef(WITHOUT_PSYCO) entire section
> 
> Are you trying to preserve psycho functionality?  chances are this port will
> be removed (it should have already been removed IMO)
> 
> and WITH_* knobs are basically frowned upon nowadays
> 
> I thought you were going to remove all traces of psyco, what is it that you
> want to do with it?

Ugh.

Yes. I'm afraid this was a bit of a quickie. I have a meeting I need to attend
shortly. I was hoping to get [this] back in the tree. So that I could manage
the whole thing through svn(1). As I am /far/ more accustomed to that route.

Sorry. If you prefer, I'll take the time to re-do the whole mess, and post
another (correct) shar(1) file here.

--Chris

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-188995-13-lPZSroxEaQ>