Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 17:01:28 -0400 From: Boris Kochergin <spawk@acm.poly.edu> To: Marius Strobl <marius@alchemy.franken.de> Cc: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: TCPv4 vs. INET6 [was: Re: status of freebsd on ultrasparc?] Message-ID: <48600F28.50805@acm.poly.edu> In-Reply-To: <20080622120732.GA9540@alchemy.franken.de> References: <6e5cf6a70806051341x95eb814j6222c04dbfd7fb2d@mail.gmail.com> <20080609211208.GA66541@alchemy.franken.de> <20080609231419.F13655@ury.york.ac.uk> <484DBB64.5050607@FreeBSD.org> <20080609234022.GA18959@soaustin.net> <484DD7F1.9000003@alaska.net> <20080616191629.GA590@soaustin.net> <4856CC3D.1080501@acm.poly.edu> <20080622120732.GA9540@alchemy.franken.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Marius Strobl wrote: > On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 04:25:33PM -0400, Boris Kochergin wrote: > >> I have a bunch of Ultra 5s which I know to work fine (with the exception >> of >> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-sparc64/2008-March/005455.html), >> > > Could you please give a kernel built without INET6 but with > the patch at: > http://people.freebsd.org/~marius/in_cksum.h.diff > a try? > > Marius > > The patch fixes the problem. Thanks! -Boris
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?48600F28.50805>