Date: Mon, 26 May 2008 20:28:54 +0200 From: Roman Divacky <rdivacky@freebsd.org> To: Tim Kientzle <kientzle@freebsd.org> Cc: cvs-src@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, Colin Percival <cperciva@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.bin/cpio Makefile bsdcpio.1 cmdline.c config_freebsd.h cpio.c cpio.h cpio_platform.h err.c matching.c matching.h pathmatch.c pathmatch.h src/usr.bin/cpio/test Makefile main.c test.h test_0.c test_basic.c test_format_newc.c ... Message-ID: <20080526182854.GA99498@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <483B011D.9000606@freebsd.org> References: <200805261715.m4QHFZUK070554@repoman.freebsd.org> <20080526172717.GA93432@freebsd.org> <483AFE87.6020103@freebsd.org> <483B011D.9000606@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 11:27:41AM -0700, Tim Kientzle wrote: > >I'm looking forward to when we can ... have libarchive > >be the One True Archiver which is exposed > >to userland via three different front-ends. > > Actually, a lot more than three: Besides tar, cpio, pax, > ar, and unzip, there are packaging tools, file browsers, > and other utilities that are making use of libarchive. cool indeed :) are there any performance comparison done? some exciting features (like format-auto-detection with bsdtar the other day)?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080526182854.GA99498>