Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2021 20:52:20 +0100 From: Graham Perrin <grahamperrin@gmail.com> To: freebsd-current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Review D28062 of /usr/src/UPDATING with regard to upgrading FreeBSD and inconsistency with the FreeBSD Handbook Message-ID: <705578b0-9d8e-3ad2-77c2-96a20ad3a16e@gmail.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
1) <https://reviews.freebsd.org/D28062#change-5KzY5tEtVUor>; lines 2273 and 2275 With ZFS in the mix, /usr/src is present but empty (the file system is not mounted). If single user mode is recommended, then why is this not in the FreeBSD Handbook? <https://cgit.freebsd.org/doc/tree/documentation/content/en/books/handbook/cutting-edge/_index.adoc?id=84d56d3868a699c64c51d7453cedab0f3468ba03#n620>; 2) <https://reviews.freebsd.org/D28062#change-5KzY5tEtVUor>; line 2274 etcupdate -p I get: > No previous tree to compare against, a sane comparison is not possible. <https://photos.app.goo.gl/3a64FfsNkGUTPj1XA>; In the past I simply ran etcupdate after make installworld. If etcupdate -p fails before make installworld, then should the subsequent etcupdate be with or without option -B ?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?705578b0-9d8e-3ad2-77c2-96a20ad3a16e>