Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 28 Dec 2013 10:09:55 +0100
From:      Lokadamus <lokadamus@gmx.de>
To:        Polytropon <freebsd@edvax.de>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Probs with FreeBSD 10- Beta/ RC and Xorg
Message-ID:  <52BE9563.2050007@gmx.de>
In-Reply-To: <20131228015037.bff71cc4.freebsd@edvax.de>
References:  <52BDC486.1060901@gmx.de> <20131228061414.2bc6aef3@X220.alogt.com> <52BE044F.6090800@gmx.de> <20131228015037.bff71cc4.freebsd@edvax.de>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
Am 28.12.2013 01:50, schrieb Polytropon:
> On Fri, 27 Dec 2013 23:50:55 +0100, Lokadamus wrote:
>> Compile xorg from ports needs 2 days to compile on my old P4- 3GHz. This
>> is not an Option. :(
> Excuse my question - is this _for real_? I've been using a P4 2 GHz
> for many years and didn't have such high compile times. Yes, sure,
> compiling stuff like X.org or OpenOffice may take some hours, even
> the OS needs few hours, and a kernel half an hour, but TWO DAYS
> really sounds too high...
Yes, i use portmaster to get all dependencys and when i start in the 
morning and
do something on it (using Firefox + NoScript + Adblock eats much cpu 
time), 2 days
will become real.

Compiling Firefox with portmaster needs round about 4 hours.

Firefox under FreeBSD 10 working good, i get the same speed as under 
Windows XP.
Under FreeBSD 9 it needs more time to load a website.

At work i have an old dualcore from AMD and it needs for xorg 4 or 8 
hours and firefox
in 2 hours.

I doesn't tune my settings because i get later errors, when i updatet 
it. And recompiling doesn't make
fun, when i must wait 1 or more hours to see wether it is working now.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?52BE9563.2050007>