Date: Tue, 30 May 2000 16:03:20 +0900 From: "Akinori -Aki- MUSHA" <knu@idaemons.org> To: ak@freenet.co.uk Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re VMware 1.1 port (was Re: Suggestion for removing VMware 1.1 port) Message-ID: <861z2ka5af.wl@localhost.local.idaemons.org> In-Reply-To: In your message of "Tue, 30 May 2000 05:42:41 %2B0300" <39332AA1.AB94FE80@freenet.co.uk> References: <86puq5w6hw.wl@localhost.local.idaemons.org> <39332AA1.AB94FE80@freenet.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At Tue, 30 May 2000 05:42:41 +0300,
A G F Keahan <ak@freenet.co.uk> wrote:
> I still care about it. It works fine for me, and I don't see any good
> reasons to upgrade to 2.0. I think that as long as it's possible to
> get it from VMWare.com, the port should stay. If you don't want to
> maintain it, I can do it (I'm also maintaining audio/krio).
>
> Alex Keahan
Okay, thanks for your candidacy. I won't have to remove it then. :)
So, if no other candidates come up till 3 June, the maintainership
will go to you.
By the way, I'd appreciate being informed if you (or anyone else)
could (try to) get vmmon 0.95/vmnet 0.11 working with vmware 1.1. I
really wish two versions of VMware could share common versions of
vmmon/vmnet modules, and that we could import the source code into the
tree as a self contained port so as to maintain it in Vladmir's stead.
(As he has not been around these days)
--
/
/__ __
/ ) ) ) ) /
Akinori -Aki- MUSHA aka / (_ / ( (__( @ idaemons.org / FreeBSD.org
"We're only at home when we're on the run, on the wing, on the fly"
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?861z2ka5af.wl>