Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 09:32:11 -0400 From: Wesley Shields <wxs@atarininja.org> To: Chris Rees <utisoft@googlemail.com> Cc: oleg.ginzburg@nevosoft.ru, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: a little confuse with case-sensitive name ports and multiple ports with some name Message-ID: <20090417133211.GA68145@atarininja.org> In-Reply-To: <b79ecaef0904170245u1097f3a2q27e2d4b8ec9e402d@mail.gmail.com> References: <200904161900.42681.oleg.ginzburg@nevosoft.ru> <b79ecaef0904160852r55438408u8f6e2839d2d352d0@mail.gmail.com> <200904162016.25524.oleg.ginzburg@nevosoft.ru> <200904171047.56671.oleg.ginzburg@nevosoft.ru> <b79ecaef0904170245u1097f3a2q27e2d4b8ec9e402d@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 10:45:46AM +0100, Chris Rees wrote:
> 2009/4/17 Oleg Ginzburg <oleg.ginzburg@nevosoft.ru>:
> > And i forget to say for one else problem with {archivers,mis}/deco:
> > both of them produced one binary file in /usr/local/bin/deco.
> >
> > cd /usr/ports/archivers/deco
> > make install
> > ...
> > (i have deco archivers)
> > pkg_add -r deco
> >
> > (deco/NC-clone replace /usr/local/bin/deco)
> >
> > ?pkg_which /usr/local/bin/deco
> > [Updating the pkgdb <format:bdb_btree> in /var/db/pkg ... - 718 packages found
> > (-1 +1) (...). done]
> > deco-3.9_4 deco-1.6
> >
> > pkg_delete -f deco-3.9\*
> >
> > ..
> >
>
> OK, that's seriously annoying. That can't possibly be by design....
It is because misc/deco is not marked as having a conflict with
archivers/deco, but archivers/deco does have a conflict with misc/deco
recorded. If you were to install misc/deco before archivers/deco the
situation would become obvious.
One of the two should probably change their pkgname so that pkg_add -r
can properly find it. Right now pkg_add appears to get misc/deco, even
if you want archivers/deco.
Opening a PR for both these is likely the next best step.
-- WXS
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090417133211.GA68145>