Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 16:44:08 +0200 From: Dominic Fandrey <kamikaze@bsdforen.de> To: Florian Smeets <flo@smeets.im> Cc: "ports@FreeBSD.org" <ports@FreeBSD.org>, bdrewery@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [CFT] fusefs-ntfs and fusefs-libs updates Message-ID: <50895038.4020003@bsdforen.de> In-Reply-To: <5087EE34.3030108@smeets.im> References: <5040DB95.30700@smeets.im> <5084FE61.7030805@bsdforen.de> <5087EE34.3030108@smeets.im>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 24/10/2012 15:33, Florian Smeets wrote: > On 10/22/2012 10:05, Dominic Fandrey wrote: >> On my RELENG_9 system apart from ntfs non of the fusefs systems works >> any more: >> >> fusefs-smbnetfs-0.5.3a >> fusefs-sshfs-2.4 >> fusefs-wdfs-1.4.2_4 >> >> And concerning ntfs, ports/170695 is still present. >> >> All in all, I was much better off before the updates. >> > > Yes, I'm aware of the problems. We are working on making the fuse import > from head work on older releases and update the fusefs-kmod with that. > Also we are currently looking into the problem why certain fusefs > filesystems don't work with the current versions in ports. Oh, thanks! If you need me to test anything ... -- A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?50895038.4020003>