Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 09:52:58 -0500 From: Adam Weinberger <adamw@FreeBSD.org> To: Michael Nottebrock <michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: www/flashpluginwrapper Message-ID: <20040218145258.GY53771@toxic.magnesium.net> In-Reply-To: <200402181135.58911.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> References: <20040218062743.GT53771@toxic.magnesium.net> <200402181135.58911.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>> (02.18.2004 @ 0535 PST): Michael Nottebrock said, in 0.9K: << > On Wednesday 18 February 2004 07:27, Adam Weinberger wrote: > > As flashpluginwrapper works, there is no harm in allowing it to > > remain in the tree until such time as -STABLE actually support > > linuxpluginwrapper. > > You mean until a 4.10-RELEASE does? > >> end of "Re: www/flashpluginwrapper" from Michael Nottebrock << I was unaware that the patches mentioned in linuxpluginwrapper/Makefile had been applied to -STABLE a week ago. A number of people pointed me in the right direction, and now my browsers happily freeze every time I load a PDF document, and flash movies play great for about 15 seconds before they freeze too. I was able to break linuxpluginwrapper entirely by defining LINUXTHREADS_WRAP_API, support for which is directly indicated in linuxpluginwrapper/Makefile, so I imagine that there's some linuxthreads issues on -STABLE that need to be resolved. If I can't watch Strongbad's new email soon, I'm going to have to go back to flashpluginwrapper. # Adam -- Adam Weinberger adam@vectors.cx // adamw@FreeBSD.org // adamw@magnesium.net http://www.vectors.cx
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040218145258.GY53771>