Date: Sun, 06 Apr 2003 20:23:39 +0200 From: des@ofug.org (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) To: csujun@21cn.com Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: why not document load modules instead of recompiling kernel?? Message-ID: <xzpadf3mqms.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> In-Reply-To: <20030406105748.10644.qmail@web41808.mail.yahoo.com> (Jun Su's message of "Sun, 6 Apr 2003 18:57:48 %2B0800 (CST)") References: <20030406105748.10644.qmail@web41808.mail.yahoo.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Jun Su <csujun@yahoo.com> writes: > However, kldload ipfw also works. Why there isn;t any > words about this? Is loadable module not encourage?=20 The module is built without any options (such as logging), and there is no kld for divert sockets or dummynet. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@ofug.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpadf3mqms.fsf>