Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2002 16:41:29 -0600 (MDT) From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@village.org> To: matusita@jp.FreeBSD.org Cc: des@ofug.org, will@csociety.org, obrien@FreeBSD.ORG, arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Installing XFree86 package via sysinstall: need X wrapper or not? Message-ID: <20020623.164129.132928592.imp@village.org> In-Reply-To: <20020624002649D.matusita@jp.FreeBSD.org> References: <20020621223209.GP76002@squall.waterspout.com> <xzp4rfv3bbb.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <20020624002649D.matusita@jp.FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message: <20020624002649D.matusita@jp.FreeBSD.org>
Makoto Matsushita <matusita@jp.FreeBSD.org> writes:
: How do you think about this, des? I don't want to talk about xdm/pam
: breakage or something like that; I want to talk about (backward
: compatibility?) issues for startx users.
Timing Solutions, my employer, has several systems that boot into X11
w/o xdm, but instead by using startx as non-root user. It would be
desriable for that functionality to remain as we move forward versions
of X11 that are in our products.
Warner
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020623.164129.132928592.imp>