Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2000 09:20:04 -0700 (PDT) From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: bin/21918: Unjustified basename code removal and subsequent breakage Message-ID: <200010121620.JAA67593@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR bin/21918; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> To: ak03@gte.com (Alexander N. Kabaev) Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: bin/21918: Unjustified basename code removal and subsequent breakage Date: 12 Oct 2000 18:10:44 +0200 ak03@gte.com (Alexander N. Kabaev) writes: > >(And you didn't spot the real bug, either - but it can still be > > fixed by just rewording the if test) > Do you mean the basename(1) and basename(3) inconsistency described > in Bruse Evans message? Or there is something else I am missing? Something else - 'basename filename.ext.ext .ext' doesn't work the way it should. > Should we add something like the following to make FreeBSD basename > consistent with historic behaviour again? Yes. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200010121620.JAA67593>