Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 17 Jan 2006 14:55:40 -0800
From:      Frank Mayhar <frank@exit.com>
To:        Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net>
Cc:        cvs-src@freebsd.org, Alfred Perlstein <alfred@freebsd.org>, src-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/sys/fs/hpfs hpfs_vnops.c src/sys/fs/msdosfs  msdosfs_denode.c src/sys/fs/ntfs ntfs_vnops.c src/sys/fs/nwfs nwfs_node.c src/sys/fs/smbfs smbfs_node.c src/sys/fs/udf         udf_vnops.c src/sys/isofs/cd9660 cd9660_node.c src/sys/nfsclient ...
Message-ID:  <1137538540.2350.8.camel@realtime.exit.com>
In-Reply-To: <20060117225028.2f014c1e@Magellan.Leidinger.net>
References:  <200601171729.k0HHT3Ng026618@repoman.freebsd.org> <20060117225028.2f014c1e@Magellan.Leidinger.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 2006-01-17 at 22:50 +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Jan 2006 17:29:03 +0000 (UTC)
> Alfred Perlstein <alfred@FreeBSD.org> wrote:
> >   to be identical, as if they were just clones of one original routine.
> "Clones" as in identical and could be refactored into one function?

As "refactored" is just a pretentious term for "rewritten," yes, pretty
much.  All of the xxx_reclaim() functions that I fixed were essentially
identical.

> Do you think this panic can be triggered by e.g. letting rhytmbox run
> over a lot of music files on 2 msdosfs partitions to update the music
> library?

Yes, if it's dirtying pages on msdosfs (by, say, changing access times)
and msdosfs has a putpages routine, _and_ that routine is called as a
result of the destroy_object call.  Otherwise no.
-- 
Frank Mayhar frank@exit.com     http://www.exit.com/
Exit Consulting                 http://www.gpsclock.com/
                                http://www.exit.com/blog/frank/



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1137538540.2350.8.camel>