Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 04 Apr 2009 12:31:49 +0200
From:      Dominic Fandrey <kamikaze@bsdforen.de>
To:        Robert Noland <rnoland@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        Alexander Motin <mav@FreeBSD.org>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: powerd broken
Message-ID:  <49D73715.6050700@bsdforen.de>
In-Reply-To: <1238778004.65025.30.camel@balrog.2hip.net>
References:  <1238293386.00093672.1238281804@10.7.7.3>	 <49CF0803.1070505@FreeBSD.org>	<49CF2F8D.6000905@bsdforen.de>	 <49CF4EB9.60108@FreeBSD.org>	<49CF49F5.6010800@bsdforen.de>	 <49CF615A.6050304@FreeBSD.org>	<49CF595A.30805@bsdforen.de>	 <49CF6B28.2080400@FreeBSD.org>	<49CF60AB.4040709@bsdforen.de>	 <49CF6899.2060002@bsdforen.de> <49CF8E8D.1080604@bsdforen.de>	 <49CF9C19.3020509@FreeBSD.org> <49D5DA33.4010800@bsdforen.de> <1238778004.65025.30.camel@balrog.2hip.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Robert Noland wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-04-03 at 11:43 +0200, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
>> Alexander Motin wrote:
>>> Dominic Fandrey wrote:
>>>> I can rule out drm0 as the cause, because uhci0 is the only common
>>>> presence in all occurrences of this problem. 
>>> You have other examples? If you mean "irq16: hdac0 uhci+" string, then
>>> "+" there means "and some other devices", which in this case is probably
>>> drm0.
>>>
>>> There were some drm related commits last time and there are also some
>>> IRQ related problems were reported/patched in CURRENT recently. So I
>>> would not ignore this possibility without additional testing.
>>>
>> Is there anything I can do, apart from turning off drm? This is really
>> annoying (well, it eats a whole core while I'm compiling and it keeps
>> the fans going, when the machine should be idle).
>>
>> Is there somehow I can generate useful information? Someone to send a
>> kernel dump to?
> 
> Use a radeon? ;(

Nay, I use an Intel GM965.

> I've been working on the Intel vblank / irq issues.  Every time I commit
> something thinking that I have it resolved, it isn't.  So I'm waiting on
> hardware to arrive that will let me test this all more thoroughly.  I do
> have a patch that I think fixes most of the issues on Intel, but the ddx
> driver is still doing some silly things that cause issues in some cases.
> I *think* the only outstanding issue I have with Intel is if something
> is rendering (synced to vblank or not) when the display goes into dpms
> sleep, there isn't anything to block that app, so it renders as hard as
> it can even though it isn't being displayed.  In reality, this probably
> isn't a huge issue, but running gears while the display is asleep keeps
> the cpu at 100%, which isn't ideal.  Normal apps that aren't trying to
> draw as fast as they can, shouldn't cause an issue.
> 
> The other issue with my current patches is that I had to change around a
> fair amount of infrastructure code to try and fix Intel's brain damage,
> so I have to finish fixing the rest of the drivers so they don't break.
> I have Intel and radeon fixed, I just have to hit the more obscure
> drivers.
> 
> robert.

So it appears all I've got to do is wait. Correct me if I'm wrong.

Regards



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?49D73715.6050700>