Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 29 Sep 2005 09:29:11 -0700
From:      Gary Kline <kline@tao.thought.org>
To:        Mark Edwards <mark@antsclimbtree.com>
Cc:        ports@freebsd.org, Gary Kline <kline@tao.thought.org>, questions@freebsd.org, Daniel Gerzo <danger@rulez.sk>
Subject:   Re: openssl 0.9.8 breaking things
Message-ID:  <20050929162910.GC1450@thought.org>
In-Reply-To: <4DDAC70C-591E-4FEB-A497-9ECB22F348F1@antsclimbtree.com>
References:  <53367.62.127.24.11.1127925707.squirrel@secure.antsclimbtree.com> <1202482124.20050928184803@rulez.sk> <20050928172602.GA93571@thought.org> <4DDAC70C-591E-4FEB-A497-9ECB22F348F1@antsclimbtree.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 11:05:33AM +0200, Mark Edwards wrote:
> On Sep 28, 2005, at 7:26 PM, Gary Kline wrote:
> 
> I think I have a clue as to why this is becoming complicated.  I  
> didn't have either WITH_OPENSSL_BASE=yes or WITH_OPENSSL_PORT=yes in / 
> etc/make.conf.  What must be happening is that some things are using  
> the base openssl, and some are using the port, which is causing a  
> conflict.  That's my guess.  For whatever reason, the 0.9.7g port  
> doesn't cause a conflict, whereas 0.9.8 does.
> 
> I don't really see the point of having the openssl port installed, in  
> my case.  Its only installed because some port wanted it and built  
> it, and I didn't have WITH_OPENSSL_BASE=yes set.  So, I'm now going  
> to set WITH_OPENSSL_BASE=yes, remove the openssl port, and rebuild  
> everything that depended upon the openssl port.

	Thanks for finding this!  I believe in the KISS philosophy:
	"Keep it simple, Sir".  The only time  I used a
	non-system-default port was when the default named was v8
	and I used the v9 in ports.  Otherwise, FreeBSD has a great
	selection of security programs as its default.  It may be
	that some admins go for the bleeding-edge ports.  --Anyway,
	I've added the openssl_base=yes to make.conf.  I've added
	"openssl" to the local/etc/pkgtools.conf to my "HOLD_PKGS"
	list.   ....

	gary



> 
> Can anyone either refute any of the above guesses, or tell me why I  
> am a fool to go with the base  openssl rather than the port?
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> --
> Mark Edwards
> mark@antsclimbtree.com
> cell: +46704070332
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"

-- 
   Gary Kline     kline@thought.org   www.thought.org     Public service Unix




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050929162910.GC1450>