Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2003 12:39:28 +0100 From: Marijn Meijles <marijn@bitpit.net> To: arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New scheduler problem Message-ID: <20030210113928.GA10552@hoop.bitpit.net> In-Reply-To: <20030207211000.P72073-100000@mail.chesapeake.net> References: <20030206094040.GA2000@kevad.internal> <20030207211000.P72073-100000@mail.chesapeake.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Jeff Roberson wrote: > On Thu, 6 Feb 2003, Vallo Kallaste wrote: > > > On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 09:12:36PM +0100, Marijn Meijles > > <marijn@bitpit.net> wrote: > > > > > I just tried the new scheduler (yesterdays cvsup), but it gives horrible > > > interactve performance in some situations. Especially with mixed interactive > > > and non-interactive applications like mozilla. This is perfectly > > > > Running two seti@home processes (2 CPU's) at nice 19 kills > > interactive peformance entirely. Worse than 300baud modem on the > > console, mouse will not work at all. SCHED_4BSD is fine. > > -- > > I botched it last weekend. I will fix it this weekend. I'll let you know > when it's ready to go again. I appreciate the exposure. With strict rescheduling turned on it runs a lot better. It is about as responsive as the 4BSD scheduler. -- Marijn@bitpit.net --- This line says This line says To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030210113928.GA10552>