Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 17:49:09 +0300 From: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@FreeBSD.org> To: Chris Pepper <pepper@reppep.com> Cc: FreeBSD-doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] <http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/committers-guide/cvs. operations.html> Message-ID: <20020517144909.GC8356@hades.hell.gr> In-Reply-To: <p05111906b909ee915174@[64.81.19.109]> References: <p05111901b908d6f0c7e5@[64.81.19.109]> <20020516164330.GA96701@hades.hell.gr> <20020516131122.516afea5.trhodes@FreeBSD.org> <p05111906b909ee915174@[64.81.19.109]>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message: <p05111906b909ee915174@[64.81.19.109]>
Chris Pepper <pepper@reppep.com> writes:
>On Thu, 16 May 2002 19:43:30 +0300
> Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@ceid.upatras.gr> wrote:
> >
> > You don't really need the whitespace change (moving 'or' at the
> > beginning of the last paragraph line).
> >
> > You might want to make `this' mode explicit, with something like:
> >
> > If you checked out a ``point in time'', then
> > <application>cvs</application> will do nothing, unless ...
> >
> > What do you think?
>
> Actually, the real change was addition of 'this' and a comma;
> or was on one of the touched lines, so I reflowed it. I wouldn't
> submit a patch just to fix wrapping. I think it's clear with my patch.
Yeah. I know. I just mentioned this, in case overflowed lines
happened in the future. This one was not bad. So what about the
`this' change to something more explicit?
--
Giorgos Keramidas - http://www.FreeBSD.org
keramida@FreeBSD.org - The Power to Serve
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020517144909.GC8356>