Date: Tue, 11 May 2004 14:45:10 -0400 From: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> To: Gerrit Nagelhout <gnagelhout@sandvine.com> Cc: bmilekic@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: 4.7 vs 5.2.1 SMP/UP bridging performance Message-ID: <200405111445.10295.jhb@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <FE045D4D9F7AED4CBFF1B3B813C85337021AB3A3@mail.sandvine.com> References: <FE045D4D9F7AED4CBFF1B3B813C85337021AB3A3@mail.sandvine.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tuesday 11 May 2004 11:30 am, Gerrit Nagelhout wrote: > I just had a quick look through some UMA documentation, and it sounds > like it could work quite well for mbufs. Is any of that work > scheduled for 5.3? Having per CPU memory pools should work well if > the interfaces are bound to CPUs also. Yes. Bosko Milekic is working on that. There is a mbuma2 branch in p4 that he is working on that has the current WIP. He might be able to rustle up a diff if you want. I'm not sure how ready it is for testing though. -- John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ "Power Users Use the Power to Serve" = http://www.FreeBSD.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200405111445.10295.jhb>