Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2000 07:55:28 -0400 (EDT) From: Daniel Eischen <eischen@vigrid.com> To: Jason Evans <jasone@canonware.com> Cc: Seth Leigh <seth@pengar.com>, smp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: SA project (was Re: SMP project status) Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1001024074624.28803A-100000@pcnet1.pcnet.com> In-Reply-To: <20001023232717.T3993@canonware.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 23 Oct 2000, Jason Evans wrote: > On Tue, Oct 24, 2000 at 01:31:47AM -0700, Seth Leigh wrote: > > Won't this require a whole new thread library implementation? If so, who > > is leading that effort? > > The kernel modifications and userland work aren't being treated as separate > projects, but they probably will not be implemented in parallel. Large > portions of libc_r should be useable. And a fair amount of code can be thrown away without needing reimplementation :-) > > As for someone leading the effort, there isn't a formal leader. I'm the > instigator, and Dan Eischen and David O'Brien have expressed interest in > working together on it. I'm just about ready to start working on this; I just want to make sure libc_r is in a state where we can leave it alone for a while. -- Dan Eischen To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-smp" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.SUN.3.91.1001024074624.28803A-100000>