Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2010 06:22:47 -0400 From: Jerry <gesbbb@yahoo.com> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Java For Firefox Message-ID: <20100319062247.7068afff@scorpio.seibercom.net> In-Reply-To: <4BA2C4E0.1050805@FreeBSD.org> References: <4B9A4C65.4040606@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us> <970380131003171157m104953fen9f99e82823f564b@mail.gmail.com> <201003180950.04627.achill@matrix.gatewaynet.com> <20100318062151.7791fdbc@scorpio.seibercom.net> <20100318113348.281f2de5@ernst.jennejohn.org> <970380131003180354n37bf379ej9b17aab91a1c130@mail.gmail.com> <19362.8135.173250.410907@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <970380131003180713v89c630cucbe506dbba19eb25@mail.gmail.com> <4BA2C4E0.1050805@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 18 Mar 2010 17:27:12 -0700 Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> articulated: >People who provide suggestions on how things _should_ be without being >able to help make them that way shouldn't be surprised when they get a >possibly negative response. Both parties would be better served by >ignoring such comments altogether. So, what you are inferring is that before an individual makes a suggestion for an improvement, modification or whatever in a product, they should be fully capable of instigating that change/modification themselves. Is that correct? In other words, what you are inferring is that if the end user is not capable of fixing/correcting/modifying/etc the product themselves, they should just keep their opinions to themselves. Would I be paraphrasing your statement correctly? -- Jerry gesbbb@yahoo.com Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. __________________________________________________________________ If you had any brains, you'd be dangerous.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100319062247.7068afff>