Date: Mon, 19 May 2014 09:50:21 -0700 From: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> To: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> Cc: freebsd-arm <freebsd-arm@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: MK_ARM_EABI to retire in current Message-ID: <CAJ-VmonSHCyD-8jpK0EPkctVwpJ%2BPu4dfBkvATdOS3yrN4ttVg@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <C66667D9-2F5E-44E0-AF04-E9DFE70BAF5A@gmail.com> References: <C66667D9-2F5E-44E0-AF04-E9DFE70BAF5A@gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
isn't eabi on the xscale still broken? -a On 19 May 2014 08:40, Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> wrote: > Greetings, > > MK_ARM_EABI is going to die in current. It is the default for all platfor= ms currently. I=E2=80=99m eliminating it as a build option. It must die bec= ause it invisibly (to uname) effects the ABI. > > So, to that end, I see two options: > > (1) Retire and remove oabi support. > (2) Retain oabi support, but change its name to armo and armoeb. > > The rough consensus of arm developers I=E2=80=99ve polled now, and in the= past, is that we just let oabi support die now that EABI support is workin= g for everybody. > > Before I pull the trigger on this, however, I must ask if anybody has a p= roblem with my doing option (1), and if so, what keeps you using oabi. > > Comments? > > Warner > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-arm@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arm > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arm-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAJ-VmonSHCyD-8jpK0EPkctVwpJ%2BPu4dfBkvATdOS3yrN4ttVg>