Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 16:10:59 -0400 From: Thomas Abthorpe <tabthorpe@freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Cc: "Carlos A. M. dos Santos" <unixmania@gmail.com>, perryh@pluto.rain.com, corky1951@comcast.net, utisoft@gmail.com Subject: Re: [RFC] New category proposal, i18n Message-ID: <200906261611.06484.tabthorpe@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <e71790db0906251751g23bead87ped37a90c4a067024@mail.gmail.com> References: <200906181114.43935.tabthorpe@freebsd.org> <b79ecaef0906250124w4254e1dcve32f916d2e077eec@mail.gmail.com> <e71790db0906251751g23bead87ped37a90c4a067024@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On June 25, 2009 08:51:43 pm Carlos A. M. dos Santos wrote: > Guys, you have been discussing the category *name* for eight days now > without reaching a consensus. This is becoming somewhat boring. Please > do not reinvent the wheel. Whether you like it or not, i18n is a well > established and widely accepted acronym. Here endeth the debate http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=136072 - From here it is yay or nay. - -- Thomas Abthorpe | FreeBSD Committer tabthorpe@FreeBSD.org | http://people.freebsd.org/~tabthorpe -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.12 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkpFK1oACgkQ5Gm/jNBp8qA/3wCePZ4JOFZkKT5lm0ffq1cCQGvi FdIAn3ZnbGUVoumcwmxfVpVwBWVQVBDe =Qko5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200906261611.06484.tabthorpe>