Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 13:15:29 +0200 From: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> To: Cezary Morga <cm@therek.net> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portmaster -R (Was: Re: HEADS-UP: Shared Library Versions bumped...) Message-ID: <4A72D251.4070506@quip.cz> In-Reply-To: <4A728725.70003@therek.net> References: <1248027417.14210.110.camel@neo.cse.buffalo.edu> <200907232335.54973.mel.flynn%2Bfbsd.current@mailing.thruhere.net> <4A6FF5FA.5010904@FreeBSD.org> <200907282342.25038.mel.flynn%2Bfbsd.current@mailing.thruhere.net> <4A707534.8000808@FreeBSD.org> <20090729170601.GA2841@tafi.alm.flutnet.org> <4A709981.80600@FreeBSD.org> <20090729200013.GB2841@tafi.alm.flutnet.org> <4A70ACD2.6030804@FreeBSD.org> <20090729203552.GC2841@tafi.alm.flutnet.org> <4A728725.70003@therek.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Cezary Morga wrote: > Alson van der Meulen pisze: > >> * Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> [2009-07-29 22:10]: >> >>> I'm planning to remove the -u option altogether. It actually does very >>> little now, and certainly does not do what most users expect it should >>> do. > > > If I may chip in here on a similar note. > I'm currently looking for a port management tool that might replace good > ol' portinstall/portupgrade tools in my toolbox. Portmaster looks > promising but I noticed that it doesn't seem to take BATCH=yes in my > /etc/make.conf into consideration. So, is it me or there's something > more I have to do? I think BATCH=yes is unrelated to portmaster. This variable is (should be) read by port build process it-self as if you build it by command cd /usr/ports/category/port & make install clean Miroslav Lachman
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4A72D251.4070506>