Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 13:36:26 -0400 From: Coleman Kane <cokane@FreeBSD.org> To: Stephen Montgomery-Smith <stephen@math.missouri.edu> Cc: ports@freebsd.org, hackers@freebsd.org, Lev Serebryakov <lev@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: REQUEST FOR TESTERS: `devel/mingw32-gcc' Message-ID: <1238348186.2663.6.camel@localhost> In-Reply-To: <49CED0E0.90709@math.missouri.edu> References: <1761162510.20070729004710@serebryakov.spb.ru> <46ACDB4B.6090707@FreeBSD.org> <46CB159F.4030404@FreeBSD.org> <49CED0E0.90709@math.missouri.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=-9i+CiELqUwz+wCkPYNGn Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 2009-03-28 at 20:37 -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: > Coleman Kane wrote: >=20 > > I haven't seen any activity on the above email, and I am curious if: > > 1) It was missed (and this really does affect people) > > 2) Nobody cross-compiles using the mingw32-* ports (it is really very=20 > > handy!) > > 3) Nobody really cares that mingw32-gcc will move from 3.4.5 --> 4.2.0 > >=20 > > Please, if this affects you test out the above port tarball! Otherwise,= =20 > > this will end up going in and not take into account any problems that=20 > > might arise in your environment. > >=20 > > --=20 > > Coleman Kane >=20 >=20 > I just saw that this message is about two years old, and that the commit=20 > must have been made years ago. >=20 > Sorry for the noise. Thanks. It was handled off-line and we did the upgrade. --=20 Coleman Kane --=-9i+CiELqUwz+wCkPYNGn Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (FreeBSD) iEYEABECAAYFAknPsZcACgkQcMSxQcXat5edzwCfVx3ZAipKHo5TRWANYCPd3CwA ET8AnRB0RkdrVKDDIBh1ZL3pLkClwC2t =7DEq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-9i+CiELqUwz+wCkPYNGn--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1238348186.2663.6.camel>