Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 16:21:59 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> To: "Heiko Wundram (Beenic)" <wundram@beenic.net> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Endianness of freeBSD Message-ID: <20080204162108.I8365@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> In-Reply-To: <200802041436.52389.wundram@beenic.net> References: <1563a4fd0802040403x2b71eaa1yd3d8f78e7742843b@mail.gmail.com> <200802041320.14955.wundram@beenic.net> <20080204142943.U8012@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <200802041436.52389.wundram@beenic.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > Not true. Alpha is big- or little-endian (so, it's bi-endian), depending on > how it's booted, and IIRC the Windows NT version running on Alpha used the > big-endian mode of the CPU. But I might be mistaken. i had SRM console used netbsd too later, too little endian.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080204162108.I8365>