Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 10:39:56 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?Q?Fernando_Herrero_Carr=C3=B3n?= <elferdo@gmail.com> To: Chris Inacio <nacho319@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Completely unscientific poll: cfengine, puppet, other? Message-ID: <CAMwkeZyO9-qV87GP4F%2BC2uNNYfSXh13J-iXdLTxSxBEDzz%2Bsaw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAG_PEey4TR%2BZo=bq24HCmShYV1FZJpBiPAeegF5455oUjER5pg@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAG_PEey4TR%2BZo=bq24HCmShYV1FZJpBiPAeegF5455oUjER5pg@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
El 28 feb. 2016 8:11 p. m., "Chris Inacio" <nacho319@gmail.com> escribi=C3= =B3: > > Hello all, > > I was considering adding some more support into some tooling/ports for > FreeBSD and I thought it would probably be good to get configuration > management support some thought. So I can understand under certain Linux > flavors (e.g. RedHat) that puppet is the de facto choice - since the > distribution packager has chosen one. > > Is there a dominant one for FreeBSD? > > Happy if you would just reply with which one, if any, you use. If you want > to add more to the conversation, that's fine. I understand the mailing > list I posted this to and the likely audience - as I said I started think > about this from adding more support into some ports. > > Thanks > chris inacio > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Ansible?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAMwkeZyO9-qV87GP4F%2BC2uNNYfSXh13J-iXdLTxSxBEDzz%2Bsaw>