Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2003 16:24:48 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> Cc: arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: depend + all vs dependall Message-ID: <20030330002448.GA32150@rot13.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20030329.163343.53040416.imp@bsdimp.com> References: <20030329.163343.53040416.imp@bsdimp.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--4Ckj6UjgE2iN1+kY Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Sat, Mar 29, 2003 at 04:33:43PM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote: > My only concern with the patches is that they might interact badly > with a bug I remember from the FreeBSD 1.1R days, but can't reproduce, > in make. Once upon a time, 'make depend all' was different than 'make > depend && make all' because the .depend files weren't re-read after > the depend phase, but before the all phase, whereas two makes this > would be the case. Since this change combines the two, I'm a little > worried about that. Is that still a bug in FreeBSD's make? It won't > matter for a pure, virgin tree, but might for incremental builds... I'm pretty sure that's still true. Kris --4Ckj6UjgE2iN1+kY Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE+hjlQWry0BWjoQKURAvSyAJ4/h2XKIIvBigu3+3IKhIC/vCm1AACgvdRH 2fHDR+FDgOiO8yJT6UkEAks= =As70 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --4Ckj6UjgE2iN1+kY--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030330002448.GA32150>