Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 06:46:20 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> To: Erich Dollansky <erichfreebsdlist@ovitrap.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Michel Talon <talon@lpthe.jussieu.fr> Subject: Re: CLANG vs GCC tests of fortran/f2c program Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206200645290.71030@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> In-Reply-To: <201206201140.31525.erichfreebsdlist@ovitrap.com> References: <402199FE-380B-41B6-866B-7D5D66C457D5@lpthe.jussieu.fr> <854D02B1-CA89-4F5E-8773-DB05F2868D74@lpthe.jussieu.fr> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206200618290.46371@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <201206201140.31525.erichfreebsdlist@ovitrap.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> >> How about leaving politics and getting back to technical grounds? > > what is the problem as long as gcc is in the ports tree? what is a problem as clang is in the ports tree? the problem is that these compilers are not 100% compatible and soon if clang will be default it will be not just easy to build freebsd with gcc.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.1206200645290.71030>