Date: Mon, 23 May 2016 21:36:35 -0700 From: bob prohaska <fbsd@www.zefox.net> To: Ian Lepore <ian@freebsd.org> Cc: "freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org" <freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: Confirmed update procedure for a self-hosted armv6hf system Message-ID: <20160524043635.GD52783@www.zefox.net> In-Reply-To: <1464060955.1180.441.camel@freebsd.org> References: <1463976239.1180.406.camel@freebsd.org> <20160523215248.GA52783@www.zefox.net> <1464055880.1180.433.camel@freebsd.org> <20160524024027.GB52783@www.zefox.net> <1464058197.1180.439.camel@freebsd.org> <20160524031855.GC52783@www.zefox.net> <1464060955.1180.441.camel@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 09:35:55PM -0600, Ian Lepore wrote: > > Hmm, apparently my guess at the problem was wrong (although I think it > is true that the standard freebsd update sequence of booting to the new > kernel before installing world will fail here). > > I'm out of ideas right now. > I'll wait...mine are likely to be worse.... An aside though: the hf upgrade seems unable to materially affect compilation and installation. Is this mostly a naming mismatch between old and new version? bob prohaska
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20160524043635.GD52783>