Date: Sat, 06 Mar 2010 03:37:04 -0500 From: jhell <jhell@DataIX.net> To: Matthias Gamsjager <mgamsjager@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: route -cloning flag Message-ID: <4B921430.4060302@DataIX.net> In-Reply-To: <585602e11003042244x3ce4c97fj8cc7df8d40224f3c@mail.gmail.com> References: <1267716511.43321.3.camel@DraGoN.OTEL.net> <1267718672.43321.39.camel@DraGoN.OTEL.net> <585602e11003042244x3ce4c97fj8cc7df8d40224f3c@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 3/5/2010 1:44 AM, Matthias Gamsjager wrote: > One thing is sure. the route won't survive a reboot. Guess you can add > it to rc.conf but I have never tried it. > check /etc/defaults/rc.conf for static_routes and its usage. Maybe you already know about this but I wanted to double check with you just in case. rc.conf(5) also has a example usage. > On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 5:04 PM, Iasen Kostov <tbyte@otel.net> wrote: >> On Thu, 2010-03-04 at 17:28 +0200, Iasen Kostov wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> How can I simulate 'route add -net 1.1.1.1/32 -cloning -iface fxp0' on >>> FreeBSD 8.x because it appears that somebody has axed cloning ? >>> And no it does NOT work without -cloning. And I don't really want to >>> argue if it is correct or not - It worked not it doesn't ;) >>> >>> Regards, Iasen. >>> >> >> Hum when I actually got to the machine and added the route it worked >> without -cloning. I can Only guess that the on site support did >> something wrong but I really don't know what mistake can they make in >> that simple command (route add -net 1.1.1.1/32 -iface fxp0) ;) . I hope >> it will still works after reboot ... And the man page is wrong, It >> still lists -cloning as valid option, with that in mind and remote >> server one can easily lock himself out :( >> >> Regards, Iasen. >> -- jhell
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4B921430.4060302>