Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 22 May 2005 10:31:59 +0200
From:      "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
To:        Stephan Uphoff <ups@tree.com>
Cc:        Colin Percival <cperciva@freebsd.org>, "freebsd-arch@freebsd.org" <freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Scheduler fixes for hyperthreading 
Message-ID:  <40426.1116750719@critter.freebsd.dk>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 21 May 2005 22:44:25 EDT." <1116729865.1917.92.camel@palm> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <1116729865.1917.92.camel@palm>, Stephan Uphoff writes:

>Would it be enough to disable access to RDTSC for user processes?
>I believe the attack needs a very exact time source.

You'd be surprised how much software breaks if you do that :-(

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?40426.1116750719>