Date: Sun, 07 Sep 1997 15:34:46 -0300 From: "Fernando P. Schapachnik" <fschapac@dc.uba.ar> To: Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com> Cc: obrien@nuxi.com, questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problems compiling DDD 2.1.1 from the ports. Message-ID: <3.0.2.16.19970907153446.12f7c068@milagro.dc.uba.ar> In-Reply-To: <19970906103503.22086@lemis.com> References: <m0x6u9g-000iyOC@milagro.dc.uba.ar> <19970905085908.54129@lemis.com> <m0x6u9g-000iyOC@milagro.dc.uba.ar>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 10:35 6/09/97 +0930, you wrote: >On Fri, Sep 05, 1997 at 11:54:16AM +0300, Fernando Pablo Schapachnik wrote: >>> >>>> And why is it searching for *that* version instead of using the one >>>> installed in my system?. >>> >>> Good question. What's in the Makefile? Where did you install ld >>> from? >> >> From scratch, it came whith FBSD 2.1.7.1. > >I seem to recall you saying something about rebuilding gcc. I wonder >if you got the ld from there, but it's rather unlikely. > >> What files can I search for? > >Look in the Makefiles below /usr/src/ports/devel/ddd. I don't have /usr/src/ports. I only have /usr/ports/distfiles. By downloading the libc.so.3.0 you offered me I was able to compile, but ddd hanged at startup. Then I 'ln' libc.so.3.0 to libc.so.2.2, and it worked! The only problem is that ddd hangs when I want to display derreferenced pointers. Do you guys have the same problem or it's just my strange mixture :) ? I think 'make' should look some file to know which libraries (especially libc.so.*) to use in order to compile the port. This have to do with each port, or it's a system setting? Thanks and regards! > >Greg > > Fernando P. Schapachnik fpscha@cnba.uba.ar fschapac@dc.uba.ar
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3.0.2.16.19970907153446.12f7c068>