Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2002 14:56:28 -0400 (EDT) From: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> To: Mitsuru IWASAKI <iwasaki@jp.FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/i386/pci pci_bus.c Message-ID: <XFMail.20020923145628.jhb@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20020924.012429.38090552.iwasaki@jp.FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 23-Sep-2002 Mitsuru IWASAKI wrote: > Hi, > >> as a result of the apm change, apm(4) is no longer even probed when >> ACPI is present and in use, so we can probably axe a lot of the hacks >> to have apm and acpi refuse to probe if the other was present. > > Then, should we update the hints file too? Actually, apm and npx don't use the 'at' it would seem. Instead, their identify routines create a suitable device that then gets probed: revision 1.102 date: 1999/08/22 19:51:33; author: peter; state: Exp; lines: +15 -1 Add an identify method to allow apm to attach itself to the nexus without hooks in there. and revision 1.76 date: 1999/08/22 19:52:51; author: peter; state: Exp; lines: +18 -1 Add an identify method to allow npx to arrange itself to be attached to the nexus without explicit code in the nexus to do so. We should probably do the same thing with pmtimer, BTW, so it doesn't need a hint for it to exist. -- John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ "Power Users Use the Power to Serve!" - http://www.FreeBSD.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?XFMail.20020923145628.jhb>