Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 18:19:53 -0700 From: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.org> To: Jeremy Chadwick <koitsu@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/net/asterisk Makefile ports/net/asterisk/files patch-main-utils.c patch-main::utils.c Message-ID: <48FD2E39.4000603@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20081020213840.GA13440@icarus.home.lan> References: <200810201626.m9KGQFZx016617@repoman.freebsd.org> <48FCBBC5.4070603@FreeBSD.org> <20081020174908.GA9181@icarus.home.lan> <48FCCAB5.5020208@FreeBSD.org> <48FCCC88.6090009@FreeBSD.org> <20081020213840.GA13440@icarus.home.lan>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Jeremy Chadwick wrote: > The user and I were discussing, privately, scheduler-related things, and > the PR was mentioned. I told him that ports maintainers are allowed up > to 2 weeks to respond, after which other committers can take over if > need be. After 2 weeks had passed, the user provided me the patch (the > original PR mail snipped his attachment), and I committed it. I still don't see any place where it says that the assigned PR with no activity for more than 2 weeks on it should be considered as an approval request. Just opening PR is not enough IMHO, it's usually task of the requester to contact maintainer and seek for explicit approval if he wants faster turnaround. -Maxim
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?48FD2E39.4000603>