Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 15:53:21 -0800 (PST) From: Doug Barton <DougB@FreeBSD.org> To: Charles Swiger <cswiger@mac.com> Cc: Kirill Ponomarew <krion@voodoo.oberon.net> Subject: Re: Proposed patch to inform users of fetchindex Message-ID: <20050131155254.I1177@ync.qbhto.arg> In-Reply-To: <7e71b5ace969fb16191cafdb2c1e83bb@mac.com> References: <20050131143802.X1177@ync.qbhto.arg> <20050131225850.GD81808@voodoo.oberon.net> <7e71b5ace969fb16191cafdb2c1e83bb@mac.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 31 Jan 2005, Charles Swiger wrote:
> On Jan 31, 2005, at 5:58 PM, Kirill Ponomarew wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 02:39:16PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
>>> I can't help but think that the majority of users try to build their own
>>> index because they don't know that there is a better alternative. What
>>> would y'all think of the following patch?
> [ ...patch deleted... ]
>> Maybe it's even better to mention 'make fetchindex' instead of
>> 'fetchindex target', but on the whole I like this idea.
>
> Agreed, on both counts.
Thanks to both of you, and I'm totally fine if someone wants to change
the language. The patch was just a POC.
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050131155254.I1177>