Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 29 Aug 2011 19:50:26 -0400
From:      Anish Mistry <amistry@am-productions.biz>
To:        Brandon Gooch <jamesbrandongooch@gmail.com>
Cc:        ports@freebsd.org, Michael Butler <imb@protected-networks.net>
Subject:   Re: fusefs-kmod on recent -current
Message-ID:  <201108291950.33685.amistry@am-productions.biz>
In-Reply-To: <CALBk6yJBqLwYnjxyxfT9qzCs=NDEnDjJrq4Z8T%2Bh4zfMNKL7wA@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <4E3EE2CB.6050704@protected-networks.net> <20110807211700.20043883@fabiankeil.de> <CALBk6yJBqLwYnjxyxfT9qzCs=NDEnDjJrq4Z8T%2Bh4zfMNKL7wA@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--nextPart2100347.WmilFbGKsp
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Saturday 27 August 2011 22:28:08 Brandon Gooch wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 2:17 PM, Fabian Keil
>=20
> <freebsd-listen@fabiankeil.de> wrote:
> > Michael Butler <imb@protected-networks.net> wrote:
> >> Seems that the change to the mount flags in recent -current has
> >> broken the compilation of sysutils/fusefs-kmod :-(
> >>=20
> >> It now needs something like the attached to compile,
> >=20
> > The attachment didn't make it. Anyway, there's already a PR about
> > it: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=3Dports/159322
> >=20
> > Fabian
>=20
> There are several patches actually:
>=20
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr-summary.cgi?category=3D&severity=3D&p
> riority=3D&class=3D&state=3D&sort=3Dnone&text=3Dfusefs-kmod&responsible=
=3D&multit
> ext=3D&originator=3D&release=3D
>=20
> An appropriate one should be chosen that contains a check for the
> FreeBSD version.
>=20
> Getting the appropriate one committed seems to be the issue. Has
> anyone heard from this amistry@am-productions.biz? Can we get a
> manual override here?
>=20
> Main point of this simple-to-fix issue is that as 9.0-RELEASE
> approaches, having a broken fusefs-kmod is just bad news for a lot of
> users -- and it looks bad for FreeBSD too.

Yes, please.  I'm currently swamped and don't have the time to attend to=20
these.

Thanks,

=2D-=20
Anish Mistry

--nextPart2100347.WmilFbGKsp
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc 
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD)

iEYEABECAAYFAk5cJckACgkQxqA5ziudZT1vmgCeM9fqO7F7M4n1bm/nJSW5DCvw
FV0AoNcND1JkXR3+MdJyvnwOxh44UcVL
=3bjW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart2100347.WmilFbGKsp--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201108291950.33685.amistry>