Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2000 22:00:59 +0100 (CET) From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=E9rard_Roudier?= <groudier@club-internet.fr> To: Peter Wemm <peter@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/i386/i386 mp_machdep.c mpapic.c src/sys/i386/include smp.h src/sys/i386/isa apic_ipl.h apic_ipl.s apic_vector.s icu.h icu_ipl.s icu_vector.s intr_machdep.h ithread.c Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10012052149430.1893-100000@linux.local> In-Reply-To: <200012042115.eB4LFG701099@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 4 Dec 2000, Peter Wemm wrote: > peter 2000/12/04 13:15:15 PST >=20 > Modified files: > sys/i386/i386 mp_machdep.c mpapic.c=20 > sys/i386/include smp.h=20 > sys/i386/isa apic_ipl.h apic_ipl.s apic_vector.s icu.h=20 > icu_ipl.s icu_vector.s intr_machdep.h=20 > ithread.c=20 > Log: > Cleanup some leftover lint from the old interrupt system. > Also, while here, run up to 32 interrupt sources on APIC systems. What about RELENG_4 and RELENG_3? My current Mobo wants to use IRQ >=3D 24, for my LSI53C1010 on PCI BUS #1 (64 bit). The chip is being assigned=20 IRQ 24 and IRQ 25 (2 functions). Mobo is Supermicro 370 DLE. I am under the impression that getting rid of CAMNET SWI should allow up to 26 IRQ sources and thus should work just fine on my system (modulo some hacking elsewhere). Is this feasible ? If yes, while you're here ... :-) G=E9rard. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.LNX.4.10.10012052149430.1893-100000>